Battersea rat run

Wandsworth Council have decided to proceed with an experimental traffic order opening up the south side of Battersea High Street to through traffic. This trial has arisen due to a petition of 22 signatures from businesses at the end of the street.

It seems likely that opening up this part of the road to traffic will create a classic rat run situation, with traffic now being able to cut through from Vicarage Crescent to Battersea Park road. The council claims that they will be taking measures to prevent a rat run but without preventing egress from Battersea High Street at this end it is difficult to see what measures can be taken.

It is currently unclear when the trial will start and on what basis the success or otherwise of the initiative will be judged.

There are several problematic issues that arise from this decision and why I think the trial should not be extended.

Firstly, the basis on which the decision was taken appears to be flawed. The assumption that increasing traffic is the way to increase business for retail outlets is often taken reflexively. However, this assumption does not necessarily correspond to reality, especially in a densely populated urban area where half the populace do not own a car. Given that no economic case was given to the council before the decision it appears it is merely based on an assumption. I would contend that it is a flawed assumption.

The retail outlets at this end of the street include several restaurants and pizza delivery outlets, a few newsagent, a green grocer, a hairdresser and a bookmaker. These types of business are predominantly reliant on local, repeat custom. The notion that allowing motor traffic to this part of the street would increase business seems weak given the nature of the businesses involved.

It is worth relating that research conducted by London Councils has shown that the number of customers arriving by car is generally over-estimated. The research also showed that people arriving by public transport or by foot visit more frequently and spend more money than motorists in town centre shops.

It is highly likely given the characteristic of the local area that the majority of the custom would come from a relatively short distance and most likely come by foot or public transport. Increasing traffic on the road could actually deter this type of custom.

The idea that increased traffic would create extra business is also weakened due to the lack of parking in the area. Where exactly is the extra custom going to park their vehicles to use these shops? With the new residential developments in the area the pressure on parking space is only likely to grow.

There are other ways in which to improve customer flow and help the local business. It is disappointing that the most banal option available is the one which has been selected. The research indicates that a more attractive street with better facilities for pedestrians and cyclists would be most beneficial. Improving access from the Battersea Park Road end of the street for pedestrians could be beneficial. Alternatively making the area next to the current barrier more attractive could be beneficial.

Secondly, the decision seems to run counter to the council’s public health remit. The tacit encouragement of travelling by car contradicts the council’s supposed desire to increase activity such as walking and cycling.

Nitrogen dioxide levels are already over the desired average levels on Battersea Park Road. Increasing traffic in the area would appear likely to lead to further pollution. This would be damaging to local residents. Wandsworth had 148 deaths related to poor air quality in 2008. To risk a further deterioration in the local air quality could be regarded as irresponsible.

There is also the risk of an increase in accidents due to an increase in traffic. There are many vulnerable users of this road due to there being a primary school, nursing home, church and charity building on or just off the road. Thus there is a high concentration of our most vulnerable pedestrians in the area. It seems odd for the council to prioritise the motorist over them and to increase the likelihood of accidents involving these vulnerable users of local amenities.

Finally, the decision is also at odds with the general transport policy. The high street is part of the Wandsworth Cycle network and the council has installed several stations for the bike hire scheme in the immediate area.

It is unrealistic to expect more people to cycle whilst simultaneously encouraging more motor traffic in the area. Most people cite the fear of accidents as a reason for not cycling. The act of increasing traffic in the area is therefore going to make people less likely to use the route for cycling, especially the first time, irregular users that the hire scheme is purportedly looking to encourage.

The fact that the council is prepared to spend money from ever decreasing resources on this initiative is worrying. The general trend in London is to re-prioritise our infrastructure away from the car. For Wandsworth to take this decision, even if motivated by a desire to help local businesses, seems almost wilfully perverse. The creation of a rat run here will be harmful to local residents and endanger the many vulnerable users of the road. It is far from clear that there will be any economic benefit and indeed, the allowance of traffic at this part of the road could have a detrimental effect on local businesses as it becomes more difficult for pedestrians to access the shops.



4 thoughts on “Battersea rat run

  1. Jon Irwin (@Jon_events)

    Hi Daniel,

    Looks like we are thinking along similar lines from different parts of the borough. On my blog you can see a few petitions which include one for 20mph – – and perhaps some others which you may like.

    Might be worth having a chat about what we can do. I’ll be along to the next Wandsworth Cycling Campaign meeting which is up in Battersea. Perhaps you’ll be along?


    1. garriganx2 Post author

      Jon – I think I have signed a couple of your petitions in the past. Would defnitely welcome chance to talk on some issues. I will see if I can get along to the meeting.

    2. James Simpson


      Evening – as a resident of Simpson Street, equally concerned about the proposals for the barrier (flagged up in a leaflet from the Council through the door today).

      Have just sent a lengthy complaint to the local Councillors detailed on the leaflet to say:

      – that this decision appears to have been made on the 19th November, but that the Council has taken two months to communicate it.
      – and that the supporting documentation talks about consultations with local residents once plans for ameliorating the effects have been proposed. However, there has been no consultation whatsoever and there appear to be no plans to lessen the impact.
      – Simpson Street runs the risk of becoming a glorious rat run – the paperwork mentions a no entry sign from Battersea High Street but that does not mean that traffic can not head up from Battersea Park Road.

      And, your points about pollution, traffic, lack of parking and discouraging cycling are well made.



  2. Iain

    Hi Daniel, this is very well argued and as a resident of Simpson Street, I couldn’t agree more. Motorbikes already use the street as a high-speed shortcut. Imagine what it would be like if cars could do the same!

    What’s more, the street has become increasingly popular with pedestrians in the three years we’ve been living here. They use it as a quiet shortcut from the new flats on Gwynne Road and the offices on the river to Sainsbury’s.

    I’m all for supporting Battersea High Street, but their business case for removing the barrier is very weak. Are they really going to destroy the street because people’s sat navs aren’t good enough – (page 11)?

    And it’s extraordinary that we were consulted on removing the ‘no access’ rule further north in Battersea Square, but not a word about this.

    All best wishes,



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s